Crime Scene:
  by the Free Ryan Ferguson Committee
 

Recap continued:
9.)

In Chuck's June deposition, he knew he had to have an explanation for this so he conveniently changed his story to say that once he and Ryan got back to the night club Ryan magically remembered that he had a twenty dollar bill hidden in his wallet.

He said that's how they were able to buy drinks at the By George Night Club after 2:30 a.m. even though they had run out of money and did not take any money from the victim. Erickson had never mentioned this before. This seems a little too contrived.

Why would they have returned to the club if they had no money?

10.) Erickson told Police he did not remember taking anything from the crime scene.
11.)  There are many other inconsistencies which you can read in Police Report 254 and 301 as well as the transcripts of the Police videos filmed March 10, 2004 the day of Chuck's arrest.
12.) Chuck's October 1, 2004 Proffer (Police Report 332) presents a completely different story than the one which was documented on the day of his arrest. His story changed continually.
13.)

 In his proffer, Chuck magically "remembered" the number of times he hit the victim. He also suddenly "remembered" all the details of how Ryan strangled the victim with the belt, which had been a complete surprise to him on the day of his arrest.

He also now "remembered" specifically what had been taken and who carried the items.

14.)

At the time of Chuck's proffer (October 1, 2004), seven months after his arrest, he changed many of the facts in his story.

He changed his story to says that they left the crime scene traveling east up the alley to 4th street and south to the diner, then on to Flat Branch. He says they went over the creek and up a steep bank to the intersection of Locust and Providence where he conveniently changed the location of where he says he saw Dallas Mallory.

Remember, in Police Report 42 the police tracking dogs continued due south to Locust, not west to Providence as Chuck reported.

15.)

He stated that Mallory was sitting at a stoplight. Chuck said he walked over to the car while Mallory was waiting for the light to change. He reported that there were two girls in the car with him. He said that after a brief conversation, then Mallory continued south on Providence.

Chuck again changed his story to say that he and Ryan traveled in a northwest direction back towards the "By George Night Club".

He also changed his story to say they went to Ryan's car to drop off the tire tool, watch and car keys before they were allowed back in the night club by the same doorman that had let them in earlier that evening.

The time would now be between 2:30 a.m. and 3:00 a.m. We have a sworn affidavit from the doorman stating the club closed at 1:30 a.m. and that he and others finished their cleaning duties and departed the club by 2:15 a.m. at the latest.

The doorman stated in this sworn affidavit that he NEVER stayed at the club beyond 2:15 a.m. during his two years of employment at "By George".

16.)

As you can see, Erickson's story is wrong on so many levels. His story is dreamlike at best. His version of events could not have happened.

For his story to be correct, Dallas Mallory, Michael Boyd and all the people at the "By George Night Club" would have to be mistaken and only Erickson's story be the one that is believable.

IT IS JUST NOT POSSIBLE! There is not one other person who can verify or confirm anything about Chuck's incredible story!

17.)

Please keep in mind the prosecutor has admitted there was NO evidence, DNA, fingerprints or anything else that connected either Chuck or Ryan to the crime scene.

Additionally, no evidence was found in Ryan's car or Chuck's house ...

NO EVIDENCE ...

only Erickson's self-serving statements and emotions have found Ryan guilty ... he justice system has truly failed.

1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13