Crime Scene:
  by the Free Ryan Ferguson Committee
 

Although he had a penchant for telling stories, Chuck Erickson only told three people. One of these people told yet another person, who after drinking, reported what he had been told to the police, and Chuck was arrested, March 10, 2004.

The interrogation process began with an increasing amount of pressure from the police, as can be seen in the videos.

Due to this pressure, the police got exactly what they wanted: Chuck's self-professed bad dream became his reality, which ultimately led to his Oct. 1, 2004 "proffer" (Police Report No. 332). He was offered and granted a plea bargain in return for his testimony against Ryan Ferguson.

This plea appears to be motivated by Chuck and his family who would have been in panic mode, in fear that Ryan might plea before Chuck.

What a great situation for the prosecutor! But what about the truth?

Chuck Erickson was offered a charge of second-degree murder and first-degree robbery, which each carried a penalty of 15 years. But Chuck will be serving the two penalties concurrently.  

Without the plea bargain, he could have been charged with first-degree murder, which, at the time, carried a possible death penalty sentence, or life in prison without parole.

We strongly believe that faced with a death sentence or life in prison, Chuck conveniently revised his story as often and as necessary to incriminate Ryan Ferguson and help the police "solve" this murder case.

The police needed a witness and they made a deal with Erickson. To save himself from a long sentence, he lied to support the prosecutor. This is why the whole story makes no sense. !!!!!!!!!!!

This is why he confessed ... he felt he was going down and 25 years was a lot better than 40 years. It all came down to the number of years he would be incarcerated.

Chuck Erickson is scheduled to serve a maximum of 12 years instead.

Whatever the reason for Chuck's false confession, he was persuaded to plea bargain in exchange for testimony against Ryan.

The process by which Chuck's earliest words were revised and altered to fit the facts of the case is evident in the continually evolving videos, signed statements, and testimony.

Failure to work out a confession to the satisfaction of the state could have resulted in Chuck being charged with first-degree murder.

Yes, Chuck was very motivated to make a deal. The prosecutor made it clear to Chuck that if Ryan was not convicted, their "plea deal" would be off and the charges against him could be far worse.

*****

These fabrications are part of a pattern of systematic misrepresentation that makes Chuck Erickson less than a credible witness and calls into question his entire account of Nov.1, 2001, when Kent Heitholt was murdered.

*****

Chuck rehearsed his testimony with the prosecutor and role-played the actual assault with members of the prosecutor's office in order to be ready for his performance in court at Ryan's trial.

Erickson admitted to these practice sessions under oath during the trial, without objection from the prosecutor who kept his head down with his eyes on his legal pad until Erickson had concluded his statement.

Chuck's story has changed from the day he was arrested, March 10, 2004, to his Oct 1, 2004 statement, to his June 30, 2005 deposition and as he prepared with the prosecution for his court appearance in Oct. 2005, finally testifying against Ryan on the witness stand.

1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13